did we land on the moon?

complexity · Post by **complexity** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:33 am

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... moon&hl=en

great video

Momeijah · Post by **Momeijah** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 6:21 am

Yah i Think We Did lol, Ppl Always Mention The Flag \'Blowing\'.. Lol Did They Ever Maybe Take The Time To Think That With The Moon\'s Gravity The Flag Would Float And Give The illusion it Was Blowing? lol

8th · Post by **8th** » Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:32 am

yes, we landed on the moon. and no, our government is not resposible for 9/11. Yes, tupac & elvis are really dead.

drunken jesus · Post by **drunken jesus** » Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:42 am

this is mainly bullshit

but http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saHs6J0OXVI < that conspiracy is too logical not to believe

complexity · Post by **complexity** » Fri Apr 13, 2007 7:29 am

There is a big difference between 9/11 and this video though.

LadySam · Post by **LadySam** » Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:11 am

no i like the conspiracy better that the americans DID NOT land on the moon

8th · Post by **8th** » Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:12 pm

foreigners are jealous

LadySam · Post by **LadySam** » Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:39 pm

lmao that could be a valid argument, but ive seen 100 things about the conspiracy i believe them all

RH1NO · Post by **RH1NO** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 2:57 am

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... ange+recut

9/11 if ya got time watch this
YOU WILL SAY OH SHIT ITS WILD

complexity · Post by **complexity** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 2:59 am

ah....That video has been completely debunked just like the moon one probably has been.

The moon thing makes more sense because there is no sufficient evidence we landed on the moon. We won't know until next year.

As for the twin towers. There is so much evidence that it wasn't a fucking inside job its ridiculous.

I honestly believe you shouldn't live in this country if you believe that.

RH1NO · Post by **RH1NO** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:02 am

yeah an all the enron files n shit that were destroyed in the 3rd tower for like billions worth of evidence

complexity · Post by **complexity** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:11 am

That is a careless perspective. Of course important documentation is going to be lost in a catastrophe like that.

Have you ever considered that losing the world trade center cost a lot more than it could have gained?

I would honestly like to know who wanted them papers destroyed that bad? Come on. Enron dudes were going to (and have got justice either you look at it).

If you're speculating that we knew that we were going to attacked and set up the "third trade center"./ You're actually assuming that the biggest idiots in the government would associate themselves with one of the biggest terrorists attacks to date for "what?"?

I have wrote way to much about this subject to write a huge essay on it again.

RH1NO · Post by **RH1NO** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:19 am

yeah i hear ya but that video kinda changed my perspective on things believe im not swayed easily but
some points do arise questions

Subsist · Post by **Subsist** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 7:25 am

The way i look at it is if i was a president and had the chance to spark up a fight with the east so i can run them down and rip the oil and it would only cost me the destruction of a building then why the hell not?

RH1NO · Post by **RH1NO** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 7:59 am

^^YUP prez is a texas oil man n were payin 3bucks a gallon

did we land on the moon?

did we land on the moon?

Who is online