The Tourny Votes!!!!!(beef is ***OVER***)

[~Symbolikull~]

Ok the Tourny was Bull Shit, how can one person describin more or less the events of 9/11 and the USA of the present have stayed on topic better? Drunken you mention that you said the topic was about the Present Events of the World? Which you didnt say that in the Set Up, you said tell the President about whats Goin on in the World? which i did, everything i wrote i got from Google. You tell me i didnt stay on topic, you didnt stay on topic. And im not boowhooin over a fucken loss, im jus statin way i have the right to be upset over a Clean Sweep.... and because i wrote about the future i didnt write on topic the future has everything to do wit today, you conceded fuck tard...lol
But on the other note, i would like some more clarity on the votes, as to way She won witta Clean Sweep and how exactly she Stayed on Topic better than I did, cuz thats what the Votes we Supposed to Be Based On, Stayin on Topic, Not Flow!!!!!! Which everyone voted against me For.

[complexity]

It wasn't even close man. First of all its a rap so of course you want flow.

You had concepts without explanations and opinions without facts.

I'm not saying she handled the topic perfectly.

For example you both mentioned 9/11 without going into detail what happened.

Is he suppose to just know what it is?

Of course you were suppose to tell him about whats going on in the world today. You could mention things like the asteroid possibly hitting the earth in years though.

[~*Blitz*~]

I'm not entering any more tourneys, I've caused way to many issues with this one with people thinking the votes werent fair...Its to much hassle - I dont care about winning or my record for that matter. I just have fun doing this stuff. I have fun at illest period and thats all that matters to me - so re-do the votes and have only vets vote who ghost agrees vote fair.

[Ambiguous Realm]

well as far as lyrical content goes i think ghost won pretty much all around...and with the staying on topic.. i think they both stayed on topic equally...

[~Symbolikull~]

Where did I Lack Facts in any Opinion!!!!!

[complexity]

Ghost simply had more opinions and lyrical bars instead of facts.

The topic really wasn't that complicated.

[complexity]

The worlds Nukes could kill humans in the amount of a Billion times 8,
The Feelins Innate how we keep Drillin our Plates over Millions our Weight,

Prejudice and Racism is Still Alive, anymore any man or any woman could Kill a Guy,
And claim insanity, loss of reality, miss treated and abused to be released witta Pill Subscribed,

I guess that's all opinion. At best statements without any backup or reasoning.

A Solution, to stop the Conclusion of Life, the end of Humanity, put a halt to Business over Family,
Set pride aside to gain back our truth in Reality, cuz if not will be the first to Witness the Loss of Gravity,

This is off-topic basically and also opinion.

Bio-Chemical Warfare used to leave cultures Sodomized, children's eyes left Traumatized,
The Twin Towers, showed that strength could be out powered by this guy Osama's Spies,

Why would you tell the president that first line? The second line wasn't explained.
If I was the president, I would have asked what about the twin towers?

[~Symbolikull~]

Ok listen, I want nothin to be re-done, she won, it was voted on, i think the ppl that voted shouldnt have voted, cuz theyre fucked in there mental apethy or somethin like that. And the topic was obviously difficult seein how neither of our verse we any good!!!!

[~Symbolikull~]

the first two bars you copied and pasted are facts of this world, well most of it anyways, and its a known fact that there is enuff nuclear warfare to kill 8 billion ppl and there is only 6 billion ppl on earth, so basically you jewish ass cant interperate anything, unless in shoved in your face, well i guess that works seein how you must like things shoved in your face

[complexity]

Actually buddy seeing that nobody will admit how many nuclear weapons they have. That is an impossible figure to calculate or assume. If you honestly think the fucking world has enough nuclear weapons to kill everybody, who is the fucking idiot?

[~Symbolikull~]

you, i used facts from google, cnn, and the history channel.... ive seen news articles, and internet articles, and whole fuckin shows jus on the nuclear weaponry amounts, how am i suppose to write a verse wit facts if the facts i use yall think arent true, arent backed, and are false in aquisition. thats fucked up, everything i wrote had facts in to it and came from some where, jus cuz you dont know them doesnt mean they aint true, you aint god cuz you run a rap forum homie....

[complexity]

Its impossible to kill everyone on earth with the nuclear weapons that we know of today.

Salted Nuclear Weapons, are the only ones that could hypothetically do it.

Honestly. A ten year old could tell you that.

I never claimed to be god. You made this thread, hoping for feedback.

Now you're crying when I give my opinion?

Are you mentally retarded?

I'm one of the least conceded people you will ever meet. Maybe you should stop being a pretentious condescending bastard.

"We have already dealt with a few of the things nuclear weapons cannot do, like altering the Earth's rotation or orbit. It is often said there are enough nuclear warheads to kill every person on Earth several times over. This statement is true. There are enough bullets, knives, chemical poisons and rocks to kill everyone on Earth. Nothing in this discussion should be taken as viewing nuclear war lightly. It would be next to impossible to kill everyone on Earth directly with nuclear weapons. We might, though it's unlikely, kill everyone through fallout."

Nuclear Pseudoscience claims ^

[drunken jesus]

Ok the Tourny was Bull Shit, how can one person describin more or less the events of 9/11 and the USA of the present have stayed on topic better? Drunken you mention that you said the topic was about the Present Events of the World? Which you didnt say that in the Set Up, you said tell the President about whats Goin on in the World? which i did, everything i wrote i got from Google. You tell me i didnt stay on topic, you didnt stay on topic. And im not boowhooin over a fucken loss, im jus statin way i have the right to be upset over a Clean Sweep.... and because i wrote about the future i didnt write on topic the future has everything to do wit today, you conceded fuck tard...lol
But on the other note, i would like some more clarity on the votes, as to way She won witta Clean Sweep and how exactly she Stayed on Topic better than I did, cuz thats what the Votes we Supposed to Be Based On, Stayin on Topic, Not Flow!!!!!! Which everyone voted against me For.

cry me a river
and i'll piss you a puddle
cause either i don't give a fuck
or my compassions too subtle

ok lil homie tell me, just let a nigga know

WTF is the different between current events in the world and whats going on in the world?

survey says:

their isn't a goddamn difference

to be honest with you neither of you impressed me, theres been more effort put forth after the rounds are ending than their has been beforehand

you babbled, you went offtopic, you forced shit, you mentioned shit from the past, and mentioned shit thats just speculated and that isn't true

blitz had alot of corny parts, she was vague, she didn't get too descriptive, her rhyme scheme was simple, but her verse was more consistant

i'm not breaking it down any farther for your monkey ass, if you don't like the other 4 peoples votes then say that then, don't be mentioning my name when i put more effort into my breakdown than either of you put in your verses, and you keep saying about flow? wtf's the point of a verse without flow? thats just an essay in a shitty format

why do you think you should've won? it was closer than people made it out to be, but thats it, there was nothing you significantly displayed more than blitz.... was it because you used a few multis you think you should win? i was writing with multis before 90% niggas here even started writing simplistically, that shit don't impress me. it was a topic tourney so i could give a shit less about anything else except staying on topic, i explained repeatedly what i was looking for, both in the thread and to you personally so don't act like i was being vague at all, complexity got what i meant right after i mentioned to him, its a political/conscious topical verse, its not like i asked you to draw a map to the fountain of youth or some shit

lay off the drama queen act you were one of the first to make fun of 16 for overreacting and being a sore loser and he wasn't even half this whiny, don't be a hypocrite kid.

[~Symbolikull~]

no its very much so possible to end the human civilization wit all the nuclear weaponry that this earth contains. read a book, watch a program, look up the fact. its there, so answer the question of how i write wit facts that ive seen or read but it aint good enuf because you dont believe em or know about em???

and im not sayin yor opinion is takin in and thought about, because she won thats evident, and im proud that she won, that a accomplishment for her, she beat a pretty decent mc in me, good for her, this aint about the loss, its about the sincerity of the votin process, and now its about you and everyone else sayin i lacked facts, when i know what i looked up.

[complexity]

"Many people, perhaps especially in the peace movement, believe that global nuclear war will lead to the death of most or all of the world's population.[12] Yet the available scientific evidence provides no basis for this belief. Furthermore, there seem to be no convincing scientific arguments that nuclear war could cause human extinction.[13] In particular, the idea of 'overkill', if taken to imply the capacity to kill everyone on earth, is highly misleading"

http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/82jpr.html