battle stats..???!

[dr-krayzie]

word..i like illest alot,its real dope ey..but i think we shud hav mor info in our battle stats...not jus wins and losses..how bout weight division and battle points?...and maybe ther shud also be a tab wher we can fill in which crew we reppin..dat would make it easier to know who is in which crew...Just a suggestion tho

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

[dr-krayzie]

dot

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

[2xS]

Idk Bout Battle Points, Etc. But I Do Agree About The Crew Idea. That Would Make It Easier For People To Be Recognized For What They're In, And To Boost Crew Activity For Those Who Don't See Any. . .

[Alvin]

As for the crew deal, its in all of our sigz, and its hard to notice cuz when you are the only crew worth mentioning, ur more of a driving force than something to rep. Check the stats, out crew remains the most active. Battle points is odd, but id like to see a draw section. It is possible to be evenly matched you know.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

[blokB]

CI Represent! haha. we are the most active of anyone on this site i feel. as for a sig i need to get at murk to get one so your statement is completly factual punch. the ideas stated above are not horrible, i dont hink we ned em but wtf do i know anyways....

[dr-krayzie]

im not sayin we need em ey..but havin weight divisions wud b a gud thang..a lightweight wil want to battle and win more to be promoted to the next division,midweight..this might even push activitY..oh and my fone cant show sigz

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

[blokB]

i dont have a phone..... just sayin. im no veteran here, but get real

[Kuhlerblynd]

I could create weight divisions and stuff, but I honestly don't know who is even an active battler, or considers themselves a battler on the site. That would involve making a thread for it, trying to come up with some kind of system, based on wins or battles or something, and could take some time to actually perfect.

About the draw column, I don't think it's a bad idea, other than it gives some people an 'out' on actual voting for battles. I don't want to give anyone a way to not actually vote on battles, you know? There's already a slow amount of activity in the forum as it is IMO.

And when it comes to crews, Collectively Ill is actually the only one on the board that's active, and like previously said, its more about activity on the site than anything (although several of our guys have established themselves IMO).

[Slicka]

^ i agree....the idea for the weight classes not bad but like murk said i think it would take awhile to perfect....as slow as it is at times i think that until theirs way more active that it wouldnt be that effective

[MesaR]

I dont think there are enough consistent battlers to retain a 'heavyweight title' besides a few.

[leeroi green]

you should allow draws they should go on the books as two L's

[Kuhlerblynd]

Actually, I had thought of giving people that no show two losses, but typically the people that no show don't come back again. We don't usually have that problem with active members.

And I'm not sure how you are expecting anyone to come to a draw in a battle? By the voting system, someone has to come out on top... Also, if there WAS a way for people to get a draw, why would they get two losses for that? I don't see your reasoning on that.

[JDR]

hmm i could see going into detail if this place was mad active on text battles but its not. They's a handful of guys that are actually consistant on the battle tip so it's pointless IMO. The only thing I see decent that could be done for text battlin' is get a contender list and award bi weekly points for a championship bout. Shows who interested in battlin' for the title and also gives the champion someone to face every couple of weeks.

[Omnie]

Murk...I think he meant 2 L's as in 1 for each battler...

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

[Kuhlerblynd]

hmm i could see going into detail if this place was mad active on text battles but its not. They's a handful of guys that are actually consistant on the battle tip so it's pointless IMO. The only thing I see decent that could be done for text battlin' is get a contender list and award bi weekly points for a championship bout. Shows who interested in battlin' for the title and also gives the champion someone to face every couple of weeks.

Yeah, that's more like what I'm talking about. A least until the site is popping in the battle forum more...


@ OMNI, if that is what he means, I don't see why a draw should be considered a loss, EVEN IF it were possible to end in a draw (which can't happen with the voting system)