Page 1 of 1
Wild Bill vs Hazard
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:25 pm
by Omega Bill
hazard-vs-wild-bill-rematch-vt7705.html
I stated House Rules. Doesn't House Rules state that the Default Cats are Flow, Punches n Personals? If that was the case I woulda won 3-0 off the bat, a K.O., because everyones vote I won atleast 2/3 cats. People can jus vote whatever cats they decide now? Unless its stated the default cats should be voted on. Not "Inchin it out in the end".
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:27 pm
by Haz
Lmfao .. Dat 3 Cat Shit is Bullshit.. Theres People Who Use More Den Punches Flow & Personals
2 Battle Buddy..
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:31 pm
by Ambiguous Realm
i looked thru the votes.. about 2 of them that were towards haz should've gone to bill considering it was house rules standard voting
and i believe it'd make it 3-3
but considering extra cats were brought in and they seemed to have all went to haz then it'd be difficult to say... haz would still keep his win i can remove a loss since u brought up a valid point, but the battle's done no need to really re-open when u can always rematch lol
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:32 pm
by Ambiguous Realm
k done.. im locking this till another admin reopens to make a different decisin
ur loss was removed
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:48 am
by drunken jesus
imo the categorys don't matter because after somebody reads 2 verses they're going to vote which one they liked better and justify their reasons after they've already judged who won
realistically judging battles is all subjective so somebody can lack on certain aspects and still win if they came strong with just one aspect, just depends on what the judges are looking for
with the way shit is structured as-is i agree with ekoms' decision but in the future ask for votes to be clarifyed beforehand attempting to DQ somebody or downplay their victory on how people listed their votes seems kinda bitch-like
not a personal shot or anything but this section is more aimed towards correcting votes that are dickriding or hate votes more so than arguing semantics on how votes are cast, if you look hard enough at any verse or vote you can find some reason to DQ or discredit it, imo its usually pointless to nit-pick over minor issues cause it'll have more of a backlash than intended (ie people won't vote on your shit, people will hate vote, etc.), just roll with the punches it'll be more beneficial in the long run