Page 1 of 2
did we land on the moon?
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:33 am
by complexity
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 6:21 am
by Momeijah
Yah i Think We Did lol, Ppl Always Mention The Flag \'Blowing\'.. Lol Did They Ever Maybe Take The Time To Think That With The Moon\'s Gravity The Flag Would Float And Give The illusion it Was Blowing? lol
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:32 am
by 8th
yes, we landed on the moon. and no, our government is not resposible for 9/11. Yes, tupac & elvis are really dead.
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:42 am
by drunken jesus
this is mainly bullshit
but
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saHs6J0OXVI < that conspiracy is too logical not to believe
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 7:29 am
by complexity
There is a big difference between 9/11 and this video though.
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:11 am
by LadySam
no i like the conspiracy better that the americans DID NOT land on the moon
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:12 pm
by 8th
foreigners are jealous
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:39 pm
by LadySam
lmao that could be a valid argument, but ive seen 100 things about the conspiracy i believe them all
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 2:57 am
by RH1NO
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... ange+recut
9/11 if ya got time watch this
YOU WILL SAY OH SHIT ITS WILD
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 2:59 am
by complexity
ah....That video has been completely debunked just like the moon one probably has been.
The moon thing makes more sense because there is no sufficient evidence we landed on the moon. We won't know until next year.
As for the twin towers. There is so much evidence that it wasn't a fucking inside job its ridiculous.
I honestly believe you shouldn't live in this country if you believe that.
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:02 am
by RH1NO
yeah an all the enron files n shit that were destroyed in the 3rd tower for like billions worth of evidence
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:11 am
by complexity
That is a careless perspective. Of course important documentation is going to be lost in a catastrophe like that.
Have you ever considered that losing the world trade center cost a lot more than it could have gained?
I would honestly like to know who wanted them papers destroyed that bad? Come on. Enron dudes were going to (and have got justice either you look at it).
If you're speculating that we knew that we were going to attacked and set up the "third trade center"./ You're actually assuming that the biggest idiots in the government would associate themselves with one of the biggest terrorists attacks to date for "what?"?
I have wrote way to much about this subject to write a huge essay on it again.
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:19 am
by RH1NO
yeah i hear ya but that video kinda changed my perspective on things believe im not swayed easily but
some points do arise questions
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 7:25 am
by Subsist
The way i look at it is if i was a president and had the chance to spark up a fight with the east so i can run them down and rip the oil and it would only cost me the destruction of a building then why the hell not?
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 7:59 am
by RH1NO
^^YUP prez is a texas oil man n were payin 3bucks a gallon