Hip Hop Forum

First Muslim member of Congress loyal to the Quran over the U.S. Constitution?
WorldNetDaily
The first Muslim member of Congress is linked to a radical Islamic school of thought that requires loyalty to the Quran over the U.S. Constitution, WND has learned.
Rep.-elect Keith (Hakim-Mohammed) Ellison, D-Minn., has drawn fire for asking to take the constitutional oath on the Quran rather than the Bible [...]

Don
World and Domestic News
Wed, 06 Dec 2006 13:59:23 +0000
Read more... - http://www.thesourcedaily.com/world-and ... tion/feed/

The Source Daily
Conservative News, daily

this is blown way out of proportion

hes not christian why should he take his oath on the bible?!?!?!?!? making him take his oath on the bible actually denies his constitutional right to freedom of religion

Makes absolutely no sense.

it doesnt 'deny his right to freedom of religion'

at first this kind of angered me, but i dont really care. Not everyone takes there oath of office on a bible, so its whatever.

forcing him to take his oath on the bible does, anyone thats not christian can take their oath on their religion's book in court without no hassle or issue made of it

why would this make you angry? lmao, dudes never said he doesn't plan to uphold the constitution he just wants to take his oath on his own religions book.

that whole site is twisted and bias, if you read the article he has no ties to any "radical groups", he held a politics workshop and some of people that attended were thought to have been affiliated with a radical group... as i said, this is blown way out of proportion for no reason

if he was a radical muslim supremist he wouldn't even be in politics, cause the majority of laws in the US conflict with muslim beliefs, hes obviously not a strict follower of islam.

this is the main reason most republicans are ignorant hypocritical hillbillys. they exploit their simpleton followers of christianity stuipidity to try to put any one that doesn't agree with them down and discredit them, anytime someone takes a different stand on an issue than them they try to say they're anti-christian, sinners, or terrorists

i'd rather have a muslim with morals in congress than a pedophile

Actually it is bias. Lol
The Source Daily
Conservative News, daily

yeah its like fox news for hillbillys and klan members that no longer think computers are devil picture boxs made by satan

this is the main reason most republicans are ignorant hypocritical hillbillys

yeah its like fox news for hillbillys and klan members that no longer think computers are devil picture boxs made by satan

gotta love 'liberal tolerance'

why would this make you angry?

if you read my whole post, I said it doesnt really bother me.

the majority of democrats are idiots too

i don't have a liberal tolerance, i just have a trouble tolerating idiots

thats fine, i do to. You just make to many sweeping generalizations of conservatives,republicans, & christians which you dont make for liberals and democrats.

you forgot about jews

i can continue to make generalizations cause of people like invincible or fe fi fo fum or whatever the fuck his name is now

i called him an idiot hillbilly the first time he responded to something

then he was the first and only one to defend kramers racism, and he went out of his way to defend mark foley in a thread that had nothing to do with pedophilia

so my generalization was correct...

no, sweeping generalizations are rarely correct. Becuase invincible is what you call a 'hillbilly' doesnt prove that all conservatives or republicans are what you consider 'hillbillys.'

did i say generalizations are correct for everybody nope...

but my generalizations are correct for anyone who follows that news site as a gospel... the articles aren't even written well, theirs alot of mistakes i notice just glancing and down at the bottom they advertise an ann coulter book, whos an openly racist piece of shit

anyone that follows one news site as gospel is an idiot.

the colbert report & the daily show > cnn, fox, msnbc, cbsnews, abcnews