agreed.8th wrote:This is retarded. and a bad idea.
and will make us a look bad, and will probably overall hurt recruitment of new members.
but have fun.
i think scott would do well repping as the text head, hes more well rounded than mark but i think we'll lose the audio and graphics battles pretty easily, mutual has been doing graphics for what? 2 weeks, and none of our audio artists are good at putting together punchlines and thats what wins battles, this sites never really had a good audio battle or graphics battle so expecting us to fair well in either of those its just foolishness, so going 1/3 (even thats optimistic i dunno how the other text heads are) is not going to be a good look
cool concept shitty execution, random boards coming together on a shitty free board with no promotion, no real benefit at all besides a miniscule amount of exposure, it says no votes from forum members in a battle but thats going to be really difficult to track, grouping battles as a 3 on 3 with 3 different aspects to judge the text and audio sorta make sense but graphics? if anything were to be grouped it should be groups of the same division, site a's textcees vs site b's textcees etc., just doesn't seem like this will work to any forums advantage or even go down successfully too many variables, loopholes, and flaws for this to even have a chance of success at its intended purpose
but yeah logic and reason sticks out too much in this thread, so ahem... GO TEAM YAY ILLEST.
