Welcome to Illest Lyrics forum established in 2005.
----
Free Vapes

DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Discuss what ever is on your mind, the only rule is that you leave the hip hop talk to the other forums. Want to know what others are watching on TV, this is where you'd ask.

Moderator: Loon E Lou

User avatar
Kuhlerblynd
But I See Right Thru You
Offline
Posts: 2724
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:04 pm
Wins: 43
Losses: 8
No Shows: 2

Re: DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Post by Kuhlerblynd »

How are belts vacant? Scott James has defended his belt several times, the Topical title is being decided right now, and a Wordplay tournament should be coming soon...
--~Murk McNasty~--
Battle WRECKord 42-8
Image
User avatar
leeroi green
Rap Assassin
Offline
Posts: 584
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:23 pm
Wins: 12
Losses: 13
No Shows: 1
Location: san diego ca

Re: DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Post by leeroi green »

um im talking

the lightweight belt vacant
middleweight belt vacant
heavyweight belt vacant

Scott retains his title becoming lbs 4 lbs champ
topical belt wtf anyway they retain it as well and well word play "no way man" but if so then these belts would not be class specific
Image
Image
User avatar
Kuhlerblynd
But I See Right Thru You
Offline
Posts: 2724
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:04 pm
Wins: 43
Losses: 8
No Shows: 2

Re: DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Post by Kuhlerblynd »

So, what you are saying is, when someone moves up from being the lightweight class to middleweight class, they lose the lightweight belt if they have it, and it automatically becomes vacant?
--~Murk McNasty~--
Battle WRECKord 42-8
Image
User avatar
leeroi green
Rap Assassin
Offline
Posts: 584
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:23 pm
Wins: 12
Losses: 13
No Shows: 1
Location: san diego ca

Re: DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Post by leeroi green »

no as with boxing you may hold all the belts however you'd also have to defend each title monthly

and even if you or i had no chance at the belt i would still strive to maintain heavyweight status or to climb up because shit fuck that no way man

and i also suggest deterioration in class due to inactivity on the boards
Image
Image
User avatar
Kuhlerblynd
But I See Right Thru You
Offline
Posts: 2724
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:04 pm
Wins: 43
Losses: 8
No Shows: 2

Re: DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Post by Kuhlerblynd »

Okay, so you could have multiple belts being held by one person...

Idk man, I see that as basically the point of the title Scott James has. I don't see a point of having more 'titles' to prove we basically have more battlers.

What you're saying is, you have a lightweight division for the newer cats, or the not as skilled cats, but the person holding the title in the lightweight division would probably be a heavyweight, a very good one, and no one in the lightweight division would probably even have a CHANCE of winning the belt. Makes things to be kinda silly when you look at it like that, huh?
--~Murk McNasty~--
Battle WRECKord 42-8
Image
User avatar
Slicka
Elite Freestyler
Offline
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 2:39 pm
Wins: 2
Losses: 2
No Shows: 1

Re: DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Post by Slicka »

^ agreed would be really silly to put someone thats a heavy weight contender n the light weight division, if its based on skill level then the katts that not so good at it yet can battle each other to elevate while the heavy weights do their thing. as far as belts for everything thats a little to much.
User avatar
leeroi green
Rap Assassin
Offline
Posts: 584
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:23 pm
Wins: 12
Losses: 13
No Shows: 1
Location: san diego ca

Re: DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Post by leeroi green »

yeah well me personally i think a wordplay belt is ridiculous but do think that if there is a topical belt there may need to be one in each weight class the idea is to get user activity up

meant to say earlier i was thinking that all ranked battles should have a standard bar set short like 4 bars as not to get burnt out

and i think as with title holders you will need to remain active(min 1 IMO 2 battles/month) or you lose weight

if you dont vote battles once a week(4/mo)you lose weight

if you become anorexic due to inactivity you lose entire div. rank and must begin from the bottom
Image
Image
User avatar
Slicka
Elite Freestyler
Offline
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 2:39 pm
Wins: 2
Losses: 2
No Shows: 1

Re: DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Post by Slicka »

i thnk scott has to defend his belt once a month as it is.......idk i think their needs input from otha ppl to......based just off our conversation theirs not very many people participating in this so if you set some shit like that up it could also do the opposite and kill the site 2.......
User avatar
Kause mc
Elite Freestyler
Offline
Posts: 342
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 2:55 pm
Wins: 5
Losses: 2

Re: DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Post by Kause mc »

I dono about everyone else that 'fairly new' to this site but wen i first started on illest which wasnt that long ago i was so confused i mean i no u hav information to help new comers but i think its hard enough to set up a battle or even post my 2 links b4 each battle/written. I get it now and the site is great but adding another complication to the site in the eyes of new users mite not b such a good idea. I no its not god dam jigsaw puzzle lol but if sumthings too hard to do or understand i think it mite scare new users off. I dono. I think mc's should just peep the site out carefully and callout opponents that they think they are at the same level with. Sounds more practical to me.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Image
bringin' heat but not the same shit your cats on
User avatar
Kuhlerblynd
But I See Right Thru You
Offline
Posts: 2724
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:04 pm
Wins: 43
Losses: 8
No Shows: 2

Re: DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Post by Kuhlerblynd »

^^Agreed


Setting up weight classes can help new people and everyone as a group see what level they're on/who is considered to be on their level, but all this other stuff is only going to confuse shit to the extreme. That's definitely not needed.
--~Murk McNasty~--
Battle WRECKord 42-8
Image
User avatar
JDR
Da Punchline King
Offline
Posts: 878
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:13 pm
Wins: 48
Losses: 3
No Shows: 3

Re: DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Post by JDR »

wats good wit this? Are we gon' do this?
Battle Record
40-2
Image
2010 Awards
Illest Battler || Illest Punchline Artist || Battle of the Year -vs- Cee4
User avatar
JDR
Da Punchline King
Offline
Posts: 878
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:13 pm
Wins: 48
Losses: 3
No Shows: 3

Re: DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Post by JDR »

IMO, 3 or 4 mods (top illest kids) should decide this. Like a comittee. The Illest Congress haha. Site feedback is always whack cos ppl dont wanna hurt ppls feelins ya dig?
Battle Record
40-2
Image
2010 Awards
Illest Battler || Illest Punchline Artist || Battle of the Year -vs- Cee4
User avatar
Orfadox
Britain's Great White Hope
Offline
Posts: 837
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:51 pm
Wins: 7
Losses: 11
No Shows: 1
Contact:

Re: DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Post by Orfadox »

Im with Jack on that there only a few on here who tell it how it is

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Image
Illest's most likely to shock you in 2011
Illest's class of 2010
Illest's text collab of 2010 Collectively Ill - Haunted Street's
User avatar
Kuhlerblynd
But I See Right Thru You
Offline
Posts: 2724
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:04 pm
Wins: 43
Losses: 8
No Shows: 2

Re: DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Post by Kuhlerblynd »

Well, Im one of those people...

The only way I can do it properly is if people tell me where they think others should be at, whether the mods do it or the members of the site. If I base it off my opinion alone, people will say its biased and shit, and you know how that goes.

I think its a great idea though. It would be easy to establish the Heavyweights, then work ourselves down, IMO. Either that, or I can get a committee of five of Illest's regular site battlers, and the five of us can go thru and do a numbers system to see where we think everyone is at.

Here's my biggest thing... Five 'weight' classes? Is having five classes too many? And if we dropped it to three, it seems like it would be too few... Anyone have an opinion on that???
--~Murk McNasty~--
Battle WRECKord 42-8
Image
User avatar
Orfadox
Britain's Great White Hope
Offline
Posts: 837
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:51 pm
Wins: 7
Losses: 11
No Shows: 1
Contact:

Re: DIVISIONS FOR BATTLE???

Post by Orfadox »

IMO we have 3 classes for now...not nearly enough active battlers for 5 classes...as for the top 5 battlers deciding I think it should be those who dont battle who decide which class they belong in

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Image
Illest's most likely to shock you in 2011
Illest's class of 2010
Illest's text collab of 2010 Collectively Ill - Haunted Street's
Post Reply

Return to “The Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests